Custom track database: Difference between revisions
From genomewiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(t) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# Conservative | # Conservative | ||
* Keep the existing system, merely add a new keyword to the track definition line, e.g. "db=<data type>" and handle it in a similar manner to how wiggle tracks are handled now | |||
# Radical | # Radical | ||
* Remove all existing code for custom track handling and perhaps | |||
a new system could function more like existing tracks and not need | |||
special handling all over the place. | |||
Revision as of 17:39, 21 April 2006
Custom Track Database design
Ideas:
- Conservative
- Keep the existing system, merely add a new keyword to the track definition line, e.g. "db=" and handle it in a similar manner to how wiggle tracks are handled now
- Radical
- Remove all existing code for custom track handling and perhaps
a new system could function more like existing tracks and not need special handling all over the place.
