Ethics in the News: Difference between revisions
From genomewiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<LI>London Times: [http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article1832165.ece Search engine aims to Google your genes]</LI> | <LI>London Times: [http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article1832165.ece Search engine aims to Google your genes]</LI> | ||
<LI>Financial Times: [http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/09052007/399/dangerous-new-age-genome.html Dangerous New Age of the Genome]</LI> | <LI>Financial Times: [http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/09052007/399/dangerous-new-age-genome.html Dangerous New Age of the Genome]</LI> | ||
<LI>[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/28/arts/28board.html?ex=1330405200&en=c85e708083bf4c41&ei=5124&partner=newsvine&exprod=newsvine NY Times 2007-02-28]''As Ethics Panels Expand, No Research Field Is Exempt'', Patricia Cohen</LI> | |||
</UL> | </UL> | ||
Revision as of 16:49, 1 June 2007
- Studies of published research indicate that many results are
found to be false: Dirty Little Secret
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wanting Babies Like Themselves, Some Parents Choose Genetic Defects NY Times 2006-12-05
- Earlier Down syndrome test prompts debate: NY Times 2007-05-09
- BBC News: Irish teen wins abortion battle
- London Times: Search engine aims to Google your genes
- Financial Times: Dangerous New Age of the Genome
- NY Times 2007-02-28As Ethics Panels Expand, No Research Field Is Exempt, Patricia Cohen
