Ethics in the News: Difference between revisions

From genomewiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎External References: Anecdotal evidence undermines science)
 
Line 50: Line 50:


===External References===
===External References===
* [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=how-anecdotal-evidence-can-undermine-scientific-results How Anecdotal Evidence can undermine scientific results] Scientific American
* [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~schwrtz/SftP/Towards.html Towards A Science For The People] Bill Zimmerman, Len Radinsky, Mel Rothenberg and Bart Meyers (1972)
* [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~schwrtz/SftP/Towards.html Towards A Science For The People] Bill Zimmerman, Len Radinsky, Mel Rothenberg and Bart Meyers (1972)



Latest revision as of 20:45, 15 August 2008

See also: Science and Justice at UCSC.

  • Share and share alike: deciding how to distribute the scientific and social benefits of genomic data, Morris W. Foster and Richard R. Sharp Nature Reviews Genetics 2007-08
  • Identifiability in Genomic Research, William W. Lowrance and Francis S. Collins Science 2007-08
  • Childhood Origins of Adult Resistance to Science, Paul Bloom and Deena Skolnick Weisberg Science 2007-05-18
  • Studies of published research indicate that many results arefound to be false: Dirty Little Secret Seed Magazine 2007-05 and Why Most Published Research Findings Are False PLOS

External References

  • DefendingScience.org "The Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy examines the nature of science and how it is used and misused in government decision-making and legal proceedings. Through empirical research, conversations among scholars, and publications, SKAPP aims to enhance understanding of how knowledge is generated and interpreted. SKAPP promotes transparent decision-making, based on the best available science, to protect public health."
  • Emory-Tibet Science Initiative ... an historic initiative to develop and implement a comprehensive science education curriculum for Tibetan monastics.